View Single Post
nthn's Avatar
Posts: 764 | Thanked: 2,889 times | Joined on Jun 2014
#31
Originally Posted by herpderp View Post
That's not the same thing. For one, IE was never open source. Anybody can take Android's source and fork it, they just can't release devices with it and label it as official android (they won't get play services for it, for example).
Please stop spreading the misinformation that 'Android' is 'open source'. It isn't. There's something called AOSP, which is a part of Android, but isn't a fully functioning operating system by itself. What's more, lots of stuff in AOSP has not been updated for years, but has instead been moved into proprietary Google apps (compare the AOSP music player versus Google's latest music player, the AOSP browser versus Google's Chrome, the AOSP Calendar versus Google's Calendar), under the pretense that this makes the applications better integrated. Sure, there's better integration - if you sell your soul to Google. Google has absolute and total control over Android, because they can just stop updating the free parts of the OS (which they have done, still do, and will keep doing), and place any aspiring phone makers into a situation where the only way out is to lose (one way is to lose users, the other is to lose 'Android'). Cyanogen(Mod) is a joke. AOSP/Android/whatever can and will devolve into a situation where the only (partly) free part of the system will be the kernel.

Originally Posted by ZogG View Post
With all these said, there are ROMs of android without Google services and you can release phone with it, you lose Google support, but if you can replace it(provide alternative) it's not a problem.
That's entirely the problem: it is impossible to provide alternatives to all of Google's prisons. They have taken their monopoly and used it so no one will ever be able to kick them off the throne again. Google must be completely destroyed for freedom to be saved.
 

The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to nthn For This Useful Post: