View Single Post
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#37
Originally Posted by thedead1440 View Post
I guess it's appropriate that I put my views across lest my own viewpoints are presumed to be something else.

Personally, I have used the edit posts function in the rare instances of needing to delete links to warez, add notice to the OP etc with edit reason clearly stated and/or a [MOD EDIT] tag. I have always been against editing people's words because it ruins the spirit of openness.

In cases where posts are unacceptable I prefer deleting them with reason instead of editing them. While others may not see the reasons for a post deletion the author indeed can see it from the user profile page. Here I am conflicted because I find it unfair to shame someone publicly with reasons for post deletion as the post could have been published in an unwitting moment.
Very interesting take on it all, but what when user has a 'cause' and mod has vendetta against said user? If you are afraid of shame of that user you can always make posts/thread deletions acceptable by said user, if they feel no shame showing for all: this post was deleted because of religious reasons, ed sucks, we all vi here (or emacs, hope you get it)

still, keep current modding scene, don't look into opening up what goes behind it (this is not about mailboxes (yet)), users just loathe the power users, unfair, we can run 10 articles on you down-users being clueless and deleting any disagreeing post here (because), just because, even public modlogs won't fix it fully