His views on eugenics were mostly to show how hard it is currently to write/publish non-PC thought these days (he is the best argument against it in my opinion, as he is a great man, which we would not have, but again I digress), main argument is about the cripple standing for old internet values, when others go mod-happy censoring all unpopular opinions (and targetting cripples, as long as they don't bow to the 'only true thought', feel free to start eugenics vs assisted suicide thread)