View Single Post
Posts: 338 | Thanked: 496 times | Joined on Oct 2010
#311
Originally Posted by JulmaHerra View Post
And source for this information is... where?



Delay is not disappearance.



Looking at the pace and amount of updates, I'd count them to be agile compared to just about anyone else. But surely I've been wondering for some time now if any attempt for openness is just waste of resources as nothing will ever be enough for everybody and responses are more or less hostile and poisonous.
1) If you'd followed it, everywhere.

2) It is when the developer fails to post any updates and stops interacting entirely with the minute community they have, and this after the product is delayed and has issues ... they haven't updated the Indiegogo campaign in 4 months. How is that in any way excusable, especially when unlike many startups they have dedicated community people and a well-staffed PR team? Before you try to wring your hands and concoct an explanation, I'l give you a clue; it isn't.

3) See 2. Plus, the number of updates relative to the lack of progress made further underlines how bad things have been. If there was any "agility" you'd see them constantly talking to the few active community devs and patchers who have managed to significantly ameliorate many problems or lacking features ... instead the standard M.O. appears to be to ignore them completely even when they repeatedly reach out. Furthermore, if you believe the delays are all down to a change in display (which happened MONTHS ago), you're either gullible or they've ****ed up horribly in some way ... there is no possible way that adaption for a new display panel should take much time.