View Single Post
ZogG's Avatar
Posts: 1,389 | Thanked: 1,857 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Israel
#363
Originally Posted by szopin View Post
They released information about problems with display, see where that went. If they kept shut and just working we wouldn't have a flurry of: based on that one bit of information, let me give you my speculations/wild guesses why the company is being mismanaged/misPRed/backers misled

edit2: who am I kidding, they already are going for: 'based on no information', whatever, it'll get twisted anyway

edit: would love more info, but lets not kid ourselves, every bit they release is being repurposed by a few repeating names here to fit their narrative of failure
Actually they informed of delay and the problem and it was welcomed by people and there was a lot of understanding. but again telling you that there is problem and then not providing a single information for 2 months is a lack of information.

As after people understood the problem and waited for those 2 months delay and it getting close to to new release date, but still there is no conformation if the problem was resolved and if they are on track. i would as well mention that there are holidays in Finland soon and there was no statement if they'll deliver even during holidays or we need to wait them to over.

And if you pay attention there are huge amount of people who wonder, and maybe you think it's not important for you, it might be important for them and as they were part of crowdfunding, they actually deserve to get answers.

Let's see how any funding works. Where there are once in X time report where companies that fund want to know if there any other problems and how it's going. Being a part of project and putting your money in trust means you have to get some feedback and output back, it's not a donation. The only difference, that in most cases it's legal entities or huge companies who fund and they are the one who make the decision, as they have power. in our case it's crowd and as it's online crowd, as separate people they have less power, which let the company funded to ignore them and mostly do it as they want(not black and white picture here btw). So basically just imagine how it would be if it would not be people who funded and how company would report them, it would be different. And if we as a crowd couldn't do anything about it, it doesn't mean that Jolla can use this weakness for own PR or other decisions why they decide to go silent. If we as crowd are not in power over them as any other company or board who could fund them - doesn't mean they do not have same responsibilities for us.
__________________
IRC nick on freenode — ZogG
imgrup