View Single Post
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#418
TBH, I genuinely think it's a misinterpretation, but I'll leave it for him to explain further, I can't speak for him...

I'm done here, I prefer to spend my energies on something constructive/useful...
I just don't go out of my way to try to prove why companies or individuals are in some way evil or negligent, just not something that interests me, no matter the co. or org.
I think most people are good not bad, & they usually have the best of intentions, but everyone's world view is different.
Can they always do better? Absolutely! Can Jolla do a metric **** tonne better? Absolutely...

I refer you back to several posts (inc. a few of mine) that've already posited that we structure all of our issues/concerns in 1 central location, & that we get Jolla to address them.
They've been receptive to such an approach several times in the past, I don't see why they wouldn't again...
It's sux we've gotten to the point where we must present all of our concerns right under their nose again, but if they at least address most of them*, then that's all that matters.
I'm not organising it though, I'll leave that for someone else....


*& give commitments to address most of the remaining contentious ones within a rough time-frame