View Single Post
Posts: 40 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#61
Originally Posted by tso View Post
after reading article after article about the use of the mobile net, im left with thinking that there are two kinds of people out there:

1. everything in a single device, and as small and showoff-y as one can get it at that. here you have the iphone.

2. redundancy and independence, so that ones whole day dont go to waste over a single device failing. these are the people that carry multiple phone, laptops, pdas, blackberries and whatsnot. its the corporate workhorse, where each device has its own reason for existing, and has its own connection to the net.
Exactly the point. I fall in between both groups. I want one device that does everything and is small so I don't have to carry around my laptop, PDA, cell phone and N800 at the same time. They could have easily put in PDA functions in it as well as openoffice apps but it is marketed as an IT whose sole purpose is to get on the internet and do multimedia.

In that regard, Nokia failed in making the IT more useable to the common user so only geeks will buy the device. But, they also fail for the geeks too.

I admit that I was stupid in buying the N800. I should have researched more. Being from a Windows background and not knowing Linux, I thought it would run all Linux apps since it says it ran Linux. I didn't know there were different versions of Linux (i.e. Debian as well as X86 versions). In that regard, *I* screwed up. But, Nokia also failed by not bundling more apps and marketing it as a competitor to the EE PC (which they could have easily done).

The IT has so much potential which Nokia is not utilizing

the N8x0, having wifi and bluetooth, but no mobile connection of its own, fail for both.

they fail for the first group as its a second device to carry around, and one thats bigger then their phone no less.

they fail for the second group because its reliant on a working phone when outside of wifi range. that means that if the phone goes down, the tablet is worthless as well.

sadly, this is why companion devices, no matter how cool they are in the eyes of the geeks, will fail for the common user...
I agree with your above statement about failing for the common user because it fails as far as i'm concerned for the geek too.

Last edited by Wzrd; 2008-02-26 at 06:20.