View Single Post
ste-phan's Avatar
Posts: 1,197 | Thanked: 2,710 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Hanoi
#361
Originally Posted by marxian View Post
I suspect they are not usable for everyday use, because all those people that are claiming that they would be willing to contribute to Sailfish, if only it were FOSS, have not bothered to do so in the case of Nemo. This naturally raises the question of whether they really would contribute, or whether it's simply a load of gumflap. In this context, terms like 'we' or 'the community' usually mean 'someone else'.
To answer that question, I want to contribute to Sailfish, but since I am not a developer and Jolla doesn't let me support them apart from purchasing a tablet which I did not desire let alone need, and which in retrospect puts Sailfish on a side track with cool features like peek, cover gestures, pulley favorites menu, favorites application menu, OOM ,affected for the worse I would love to financially support freelance people willing to put effort in Sailfish OS to make it their gem.

I have stated many times also on other websites that I would pay 100 Euro for a Sailfish License fully supported on a few solid hardware (Fairphone, Yotaphone, Samsung if it must, or better Nokia ex-Windows Phone).

Would it not be nice and sufficient if Jolla would open up everything pre-Sailfish 2.0 for the community (and let Sailfish 2.0 become the bloatware Android clone alternative for big telecom giant's budget phone)? I suppose Jolla 1.x mid 2015 would be a nice enough base?
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ste-phan For This Useful Post: