View Single Post
Posts: 285 | Thanked: 1,900 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#526
Originally Posted by aegis View Post
How do you know it's a bad/non-standard implementation?
I don't, but I do have suspicions that either implementation is bad, non-standard or CalDAV/CardDAV standard per se is not very good if some implementations work and others don't. As I mentioned, there are no such problems with ActiveSync.

There seems to be a lot fewer implementations of ActiveSync, presumably due to it being licensed proprietary technology.
Still, it works on both proprietary and open source (Z-Push) implementations without hiccups. Only non-standard implementations (like Lotus Notes) cause problems with it.

Like **** was I. I was banned because a bunch of precious dogmatic idiots who would rather not give money to Microsoft ganged up on anyone who pointed out what the SDXC card standard actually was. Not supporting it properly is a bug.
I was among those who criticized the decision not to license ExFAT, as I saw it being a huge mistake from average users point of view and setting dangerous precedent for future decisions regarding technology and user friendliness. Still, I was not banned. You were, and many of your comments were offensive and non-constructive (or if you thing name calling and disparaging people because of their opinions/faith/ideas is constructive, good mannered and smart...). However, there's no need to take this discussion further.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JulmaHerra For This Useful Post: