Ok, I'm kinda disturbed by this "trusted review". The date on the article is Oct 6th, and the images embedded in the article are indeed of the most recent version of the tablet. However, there are already 359 "shares" of the article, and it has reader comments dating back to seven months ago. (Plus, if you click on the "35 images" tab at the top of the review, more than half of those images are of the older version of the tablet.)

My guess is that this is not a new review, but rather an old review that has been updated. As such, I'm not 100% sure which version of the tablet is being reviewed here. Not that it should make much difference in the end, it's just a little odd...