Firstly, sorry about my long rambling. This was supposed to be a short post and continue here the "red thread" .

But..., was Jolla's main ideology that you can install Sailfish to any Android platform phone?
Or has this core founding changed?
Is Sailfish Alliance program taking any wind to sails?

One year announcement oblivion would been in the Tablet case more viable option imho.
But I guess it depends of how patient and understanding customers are, but still 1 year of conscious waiting is a long time.
When arriving from ocean to harbour, there is nearly no hype left .
Communication with their partners and reserving enough time to subcontracts R&D&S is essential to success.
This is my opinion from an announcement point of view.

My "reasonable" hardware expectations for the Jolla 2 are:
- Nokia N9 like stretched and same screen size as Jolla 1
(I have trouble to operate Jolla with only one hand)
- transreflective display
- USB C-type connector with OTG and MHL
- same TOH size as I dislike to 3D self-print my TOH collection
- RAM =>2GB chip if 9 cover multitasking aren't reduced to e.g. 4
- Internal 16/32/64 GB storage + microSD slot
- Better camera for low light environment + lighted night video recording
- 4G LTE or 5G
- Bluetooth 4.0, Smart profile support from OS
- Dual NFC support, NFC TOH reader (debit, credit, crypto card)
- removable battery =>2100 mAh
- hall sensor
- No hardware bottlenecks for software (case: browser tabs and OOM)

As some worrying trending news have been around.
Before shipping, a company / -ies lowered the amount of RAM in their smart* devices at expense of more CPU clock speed and / or cores.
Jolla wouldn't dare do such a thing?