View Single Post
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#14
Originally Posted by chenliangchen View Post
Some low-end Android devices are really cheap, like the Nokia X2 or Chinese branded devices, just sell Jolla and with same money you can buy a higher spec Android. Jolla's hardware is crap and we pay to get SFOS, I can't see the point spending time and effort here while most Android is cheaper and better in HW.
Hybris is sadly not an 'add +libhybris when compiling and forget' kind of deal. You can see how long it takes to port SFOS to any device in the wikis, most boot at start and require intensive hacking to get each module to work, as the chinese have drivers that 'just work on that exact config' and that's it (which explains why you get no updates on your 500$ phone), any change breaks a ton of things. With open drivers in imagined future it would be possible and realistic.

Originally Posted by strahl
On the other hand, which parts of SailfishOS do we really need to service that we can't do ourselves? Can't we replace any closed source part with a reimplementation? Let's say we want a new feature in the 'Phone' app, just code an alternative. Or was the point that this won't happen due to too few active coders? stefan
Few active coders is a worry, but the only chance for that is if jolla's investors drop the imagined worth in UI IP and finally open source it (on combined commercial license), their worst fears of some chinese company shipping Julla devices are misplaced, it would help Jolla/SFOS in the long end, more active coders, fixing their bugs, adding new features, lost sales when they cannot secure them in the first place... ehh
 

The Following User Says Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: