Thread
:
questions regarding Neo900 Shop
View Single Post
nieldk
2015-11-29 , 21:25
Posts: 1,298 | Thanked: 4,322 times | Joined on Oct 2014
#
133
The behavior is quite normal. All aquierers have a similar risk evaluation.
They will either
1) Require up-front deposit
2) hold back transaction payments (to the shop) for a given period
3) both of the above
Even if shop closes. The withheld amount will be withheld for a given time.
This is because fraud might be reported for a long time after initial transaction.
Its simply to cover their own asses.
PP, Amazon, Apple and others are their own aquirers, simply because no card aquirer will agree on the risk of their 'one click' solutions.
__________________
You can still support my work by donation - click here
Quote & Reply
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nieldk For This Useful Post:
juiceme
,
minimos
,
pichlo
,
Wikiwide
nieldk
View Public Profile
Send a private message to nieldk
Find all posts by nieldk