View Single Post
Posts: 285 | Thanked: 1,900 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#77
Originally Posted by itdoesntmatt View Post
i have to agree, even if i dont like it. Nemo Mobile's paypal account for collect something for helping developers do their job is still at 0.00...before that account was created someone was complaining about the fact it wasnt possible to donate with paypal. Now, that account has been created, nothing has changed.
So i am slowly convincing myself, just a noob of FOSS, that pretending and claiming for Open Source and shouting its philosophy is just an excuse to take everything you want without giving anything back. sorry for my bitter words, but i am too much sincere, i guess
This is unfortunately true, at least to some extent.

However, I still believe that partly open sourcing, or dual/triple licensing Sailfish OS could be a wise move. Nemo and Mer are a bit far from functional product people use every day so it's no wonder there is limited interest in them even if effort put into them also benefits Sailfish. Mere licensing change won't cut it though, there would need to be an infrastructure and processes to support co-development, accepting patches, documentation etc. And of course there is the hurdle with some parts being kept out of public (in regard to future products, etc). But still, IMO it would be the best way, now that the foundation and UI is more or less solid.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to JulmaHerra For This Useful Post: