View Single Post
Posts: 285 | Thanked: 1,900 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#4070
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Transparency could be a running dialogue as opposed to reports when there's something to be said. But Jolla - really it's quite rare for any company to be that transparent - doesn't seem to operate as such despite our protests.
It could. It just demands a lot from receiving side also, which is something especially this community despise as an idea ("nothing can be demanded from community ever in any way"-attitude). In a sense they tried kind of running dialogue approach by giving out information about their intentions and plans but so far it has only resulted in backlash and constant demands of only accurate and full information instead of something incomplete which stems up loads of speculation. And of course accusations of broken promises when "we're thinking about it" is taken as concrete promise. It has been like that since from the beginning, so changing to silence until everything is agreed, set up and polished wouldn't be surprising move at all. That's what I would definitely do.

I'd' say the silence is warranted until there is something to state. And unless each individual gets exactly what they want; nothing will satisfy everybody. If they deliver the tablets, "What took you so long?" and if they do partial shipments "How will you choose who gets theirs?" and if they do not ship them "I want my money back"... I really do not see a solution for them since they have failed in their original endeavors.
Most likely. Fortunate part is that this will likely be the last one on device manufacturing as it will most likely cease completely. Hopefully Intex et al. can do it better.