View Single Post
Posts: 207 | Thanked: 482 times | Joined on Mar 2016
#155
Originally Posted by abranson View Post
From a libpebble standpoint the code would probably be identical in RockWork and RockPool, but what about the appstore client?
We're also reusing native code implementation from rockwork mostly, of course we have own platfrom layer in main.cpp but the rest is mostly as-is. We can rename main.cpp to rockpool.cpp to avoid conflicts and then keep rest of the code shared.
Our QML part is also independent now since we've moved it to sailfish-specific dirs (pages/covers).
It's a pity we don't have track log for bazaar - so we cannot say what actually changed since initial import. And unfortunately during the initial import you didn't preserve original state so we also don't have a track of how far we deviated from them during the import.
From what I can see we have only servicecontrol.cpp, pebble.cpp and main.cpp (of course) changed since initial import.
These are topics to settle down if we targeting the merge though.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ruff For This Useful Post: