Thread: Jolla C
View Single Post
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#274
Originally Posted by bluefoot View Post
Then why do Android Apps in AD not suffer any kind of performance penalty and work nominally, but Sailfish apps the opposite (and UT not).

No your experience is not. Everyone's is the same.

I see we're back to pretending that major problems do not exist. I seem to recall you were party to the original discussions about this, and had no answer for it then, and don't now.

@MartinK

Ubuntu Touch's UI needs serious work. That's slow / stuttery. Native apps, or more particularly the browser are very quick and make proper use of all available resources - moreso than in Android, vastly more so than SF.
That's because the whole OS is a browser

edit: love how your experience trumps everyone elses, here a vid of iOS (so quick and instant) reddit app launching:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE9J75POtYE
0:19-0:22 to get the initial screen, 2 second on Jolla with quickditt, totally slow and useless and on non-anecdote level, bluefoot waits 5 seconds for the quickditt to launch (sure, no idea if it has more features, but surely trumps sailfish, it's just slow I read on a forum)

edit2: android variants:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9YzB5j1_64
0:24-0:29 (though at least the main window is loaded by 26, so 2s as SFOS)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iS6UPDCEIyI
0:06-0:11 (main window again at least displays in 1-2 seconds)

Last edited by szopin; 2016-06-07 at 19:47.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: