Thread: Jolla C
View Single Post
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#332
Originally Posted by kinggo View Post
you can call it whatever you want, but we all know what it is. And shifting a few k of phones this way won't help them much.
If this phone is not CE compliant and can not be sold via regular channels, then they should have put more effort in their EU partner, finish that fairphone port and start selling something that can be sold in EU and is available. And that would help both of them. Sure, fairphone is not 179€ but still, I'm sure that with proper sailfish on it, they could sold 2k of them. Maybe not in 2x4 hours period but still.....
Perhaps I'm missing some bit of this dialogue; but why is any of this important on a community/dev device? It's different than other prior Nokia device programs, but not too dissimilar to the BlackBerry Dev Alpha B device - something given out to a cross-section of folks, mostly devs, not "sold" but sent out and represented an incoming device; in this case the BlackBerry Z10.

The convo seems to overlook that... or something and has gotten into certificate particulars for a device that's not really sold, but exists for other reasons.

Or... am I missing something huge? Which very well might be the case.

Sorry to ask such a potentially stupid question but this whole convo seems just off to me from afar and isn't where it's important (to me)

Thanks in advance.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: