Thread: Jolla C
View Single Post
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#815
Originally Posted by mikelima View Post
Does it really miss the gyro and compass, or is it simply a matter of drivers?
No way to know for sure.

In the meanwhile I've noticed that aliendalvik seems to pass a fixed "0 deg." compass reading to Android programs rather than a "missing compass" value. Annoying.


After playing a bit with it...

The performance under Gentoo/XFCE chroot is just slightly slower than the SbJ, so that's good. The extra cores do help when compiling.

I can't find a difference in performance with the builtin apps; even the browser seems to take exactly the same time for rendering than the Sbj. Why would it be different? The cores are slightly slower, the eMMC seems to have almost identical performance, and I never had problems with RAM on the Sbj (at this point, I am running XFCE AND the sailfish-browser and I still have 1GB free, including caches).

ext4 is surprisingly _much_ more performing on the eMMC, though, so booting is a lot quicker.
However, separate / and /home partitions??????? Optification is back?

Sunlight readability slightly improved, albeit today it was slightly cloudy here.

Last edited by javispedro; 2016-07-22 at 13:16.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: