View Single Post
chenliangchen's Avatar
Posts: 1,478 | Thanked: 9,871 times | Joined on Dec 2008 @ Shanghai / London
#212
Originally Posted by DrYak View Post

Then, the SoC : well seems that it's a popular one, so hopes for more maintenance/hacks down the line. (And its still a *mid*-range 6xx. Unlike Fairphone who are considering switching to *low* range 4xx for their potential future FP3). Also given the much lower power requirement of SFOS, it's still fine by me.
We did some analysis on this chipset, compared with other Qualcomm SoCs:

Although this is 6** series, this is more powerful than old 8974 shipset (Snapdragon 800/801) on every aspect.

For daily operation, it's more smooth and stronger than for example 808 to some extent. It uses 4x A53 for normal use.

Power efficiency is awesome! (Being a 14nm processor) Thanks to this chipset my Moto Z Play can get a nearly 3 days average use battery life, and no lag at all.

This chipset is widely used in other brands and proved stable and useful.

Its only weakness (well only "weak" when you compare with flagship SoCs) is on graphic performance and upto 1080p support.

Why we don't want to use SoC like snapdragon 820?

- End user will probably pay 300+ more bucks
- Much more power consumption
- Want to play games? Then get a PS4 or Switch
- Want 2K screen? I don't see any benefits of 2K resolution over 1080p on a 5.5 inch, unless it's under microscope...
 

The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to chenliangchen For This Useful Post: