View Single Post
Posts: 74 | Thanked: 355 times | Joined on Aug 2017
#1305
Originally Posted by atbeyi View Post
You would definitely be right if he haven't gave this link on chat for that RECENT NEWS he has mentioned. That link points to description of Sony Flash Tool (EMMA), and it hasn't been changed for years. Other people asked him on the comments about it, i asked him in chat about it, that it is not a recent news or a news at all.
So, James was wrong in this bit. Do you never make any mistakes? How long do you want to drag this example on to show that "Jolla is lying to us about everything" (or what do you want to prove here)?

I am wondering, don't you think we should have higher expectations from a Public Relations person? If this was any other company and their PR claimed that there is a news about the topic being talked, then link to something unrelated, would your idea of that PR department be same?
"Any other company" probably have a bigger PR department where publications are reviewed by multiple people and adjusted until they are soulless and as uninformative as possible. Is that what you are looking for?
I don't think Jolla has the funds for a big PR department, so it's probably James alone who has to handle all that stuff. Seeing the reactions and language in the blog comments and forums, I'm frankly glad I don't have to do his work.
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to jenix For This Useful Post: