View Single Post
Posts: 100 | Thanked: 307 times | Joined on Jan 2015 @ Argentina
#209
Originally Posted by wicket View Post
I believe so. Which part do you think I did not follow?
I don't know. Just asked. But put only your questions without explanations maybe. It is what you want they answer didn't you?

The whole point of my post is that I am rather sceptical and I want to give them the opportunity to alleviate my scepticism.
Why you expect they alleviate you? Surely your skepticism is inherited from other crowdfunding and bad past experiencies. Not from Purism. They had been successful on what they had done until now.



Having said that, I thought I was enthusiastic. I didn't mention any of my complaints that I posted here on TMO
,
Excellent!. Complain is the far from being a way to get people closer.

I congratulated them on reaching their target, I showed intent to purchase,
Great!

and I made a suggestion of how they might be able to make their crowd funding campaign accessible to more people.
Your proposal was good, but after reading their philosophy and why's I understand the priority of Purism is not the $$. I mean, they don't put cheaper products as a priority. Their Vision is foremost the user's right to free software privacy, and security. The cost is not in first place. So, the money that backers pay is for User's right to Free Software Privacy, even at hardware level whenever it is possible.

Sorry, if this it's disturbing to you, I just try to put in the shoes of the admin who prefers answer some punctual questions, and not try to spend time to convince someone who even has not made an investment yet, and perhaps never do because is skeptical. Do you get what I am trying to say?.

Not offense at all intended.

---- and they got $1,803,834 and 5 days to go ---

Last edited by maegon9y00; 2017-10-18 at 21:07.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to maegon9y00 For This Useful Post: