View Single Post
Posts: 71 | Thanked: 456 times | Joined on Jan 2017 @ Portugal
#22
Originally Posted by olf View Post
It should not, IMO.[*] Properly hosted public source code allows for retracting who committed which parts of the code when at any time. This transparency eases many technical and social aspects of software development.[*] Properly hosted public source code is accompanied by a public bug tracker, at least publicly documenting known bugs, but usually also enabling everyone (including you and me) to file observed bugs.
One does not need to be a coder to contribute to FLOSS![/LIST]All this (and some other more minor effects) usually lead to an environment, which I structurally trust much more than any hidden and closed software development model, even without personally knowing anybody involved in it.
Very well said. It comes to my mind the Qt Company among many others, where any one can contribute, even I did some very small code contribution and the public bug tracker gives me very confidence in that company even if I didnt see all the millions lines of code.
I personally much rather use linux, but I also have to use windows for my professional frelance work, I have a windows projecad license (similar to autocad). This topic just gave the ideia to write an email to them asking for a linux version. Probably they wont do it, but I think if people start raising their hands maybe companies start to listen.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to john_god For This Useful Post: