I think it's important to have nah sayers around to keep a reality check.

I don't agree with most of his arguments, but also don't think he should be banned.

What I don't understand is why if you guys are so offended by shaihkritzer, why keep responding to his every post? If he is a trigger for you maybe ask yourself is it important to reply back. I think many have made good arguments against most of his concerns. At this point those that argue are mostly just repeating the same points.

So the only negative I can see is someone new coming here and seeing all the negative point about f(x), however there are so many positive hands-on account and meeting with the f(x) crew ... that I would think it should drown out most folks concerns.

There have been plenty of failed project that made many promises on the internet ... especially in the tech sector ... so I can understand needing more concrete proof of delivery. But I personally think in this case the level of expectation is above and beyond what most companies and project will meet. Look at purism, pinphone, and the failed n9 n950, ubuntu phone .. they all had/have issues with delivery times or promises.


My bigger point is you don't always need to respond to opinions that you don't agree with

I still love this place with all its good and less than good. I just ignore the stuff that doesn't interest me.

This was much longer than I though sorry about that.

Cheers

x