Thread: Qt "stuck" at v5.6 in SFOS
View Single Post
olf's Avatar
olf is offline olf
2021-03-24 , 01:05
Posts: 305 | Thanked: 1,246 times | Joined on Aug 2015
#24
Originally Posted by javispedro View Post
Do note: I am not questioning that you need to provide the "encryption keys" if you transfer ownership.
Please quote from the license!
I cannot find any of the terms "ownership", "owner", to "own" or "encryption keys" in the GPLv3.
So what are you talking about?

As you quoted, the point is "transferring the right of possession and use" in legalese.
To "own" (as a legal term) is not a requirement.

Originally Posted by javispedro View Post
[...] Google ships products with GPLv3 software just fine.
Which?
If you really know any (and are not just trolling), please provide a pointer to Google software for the aforementioned target audience ("big licensees") with GPLv3 components.
I cannot see any in AOSP, ChromeOS, Chromium etc.!

Please stop FUDding and substanciate your statements with sources.

Side note:
Many of the FSF's explanations around the GPLv3 state some things (their details vary), which are definitely not in the GPLv3.
Some believe this is done deliberately.
Last edited by olf; 2021-03-24 at 01:50.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to olf For This Useful Post: