View Single Post
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#60
Originally Posted by tabletrat View Post
And you have a right to that opinion, as long as you remember that that is what it is. Obviously any computer ties you to its ecosystem, as you need software for it, parts for it. No different than any other system, just that in the windows/linux/PC world, becasue it is a much bigger market you don't see the locks because they are wider.
i guess it depends on what one define as a ecosystem. i think its just funny that in this day and age, when even osx runs on x86, apple still insist on tying the os to "their" hardware.

I am not someone who uses brand names either, but sadly I am not in the 'more often than not' catagory that you are.
If you actually 'need' photoshop or ms office, that is what you need. Neither of them have an equivilent piece of software. Sure, you can do similar things with other software, but not the same thing. I hate office with a passion, but in my job I have to use it. There is nothing else that does exactly the same job (and I wish there was). I have tried all the office clones, open source or commercial.
Again with photoshop, there is nothing to touch it if you need what it does although like you say, most people don't need what it does, they just pirated it as it was easier than getting something else.
sorry that i wasnt clear. im ok with people using something or other in the work environment. but when there is no work related reason to choose product x over product y, and product x even has a more restricted feature set, it screams fashion to me.

people pirating photoshop to do silly filter combos, when they could just have downloaded gimp. using ms word to write something when even the notepad app that comes with windows would do. thats the kind of stuff that im talking about.

I do to, I never buy something because of a trend, but to me apple isn't that. It is something that works without the hassle. If the nokia IT did what my iPod did, I would use it, but it doesn't. If a linux or windows PC did what my mac does, I would have it, but they don't so I don't. I don't see why I should compromise what I need because it is fasionable to call apple just a style thing.
But unlike what seems to be really common here, if someone else doesn't want to use what I am using, I really don't find it a big problem.
and i dont have a problem with it either. its just that as of the day apple launched the iphone, its been iphone killer x y z and so on poping out of the woodwork. its as if the mobile phone with music player didnt exist before the iphone showed up. same thing it was with the ipod, only that when the first one of those showed up, they really did have an edge on the other products of the time.

but then i also keep saying that the iphone is a product of the us mobile phone market. at least thats the impression im left with when people talk about special tethering plans needed to use their phone as a internet connection of their laptop or other devices.

btw, what was that quite about freedom and safety again?

oh, and to give one more indication of the kind of person i am. i would have much rather seen w3c go with ogg video and audio as default web format. no matter how much worse the video part is then other codecs out there.

Last edited by tso; 2008-03-25 at 09:18.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to tso For This Useful Post: