View Single Post
Posts: 66 | Thanked: 17 times | Joined on Apr 2008
#38
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post

Either way, forums are a pretty weak metric for measuring sales figures.
..Which is why I would only use them them as part of a package of about half a dozen indicators. If it was just forum size vs Nokia's claims, then you'd be in a strong position. But it's not. (Btw - substituting a strawman version of an argument you disagree with rarely works on the Internet or real life...)

The numbers we got from the talk last year are much more useful for that.
Sure. Whenever someone with a vested interest tells you something to their advantage it has to be truth: there really *were* WMD in Iraq, and those pills you were offered really *will* make your penis larger. Honestly! Keep handing over the money and you *personally* will be a WMD!

Every independent metric I can come up with says that NIT sales are probably tiny - can you come up with anything but "Nokia says <insert ambiguous, non-legally binding claim>"? Because that just isn't an argument an average grown up will believe, any more than he will believe that adding self-approval smilies makes his or herself look more intelligent or his argument stronger.