Thread
:
why "modest" over "claws"
View Single Post
macr0t0r
2008-04-18 , 17:43
Posts: 54 | Thanked: 11 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#
17
Modest: lightweight, fast, integrated. But...it's a mobile-app with mobile limitations. Palm-users will know what I'm talking about.
Claws: full-featured and mature. But...squeezing that into a tablet screen will feel a bit cramped and slow.
I currently use Modest since I do MOST of my major email on my desktop. I just wanted something that allows me to quickly read the latest while on the go. Modest's integration with contacts, faster speed, LED-indicator, and more finger-friendly interface made it the perfect choice. However, there are times I wish it had Claw's offline reading capability (Modest will not download all contents and attachments of an IMAP folder, even if you set it in the preferences), and Claws does a better job of displaying a fully-formatted html email with pictures.
If you have an IMAP account, there's nothing stopping you from installing both. For awhile, I used the default email app as a mail indicator, but would run Claws for reading and managing.
- Jim
Quote & Reply
|
macr0t0r
View Public Profile
Send a private message to macr0t0r
Find all posts by macr0t0r