View Single Post
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#443
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
The contextual approach we had going for a while makes the most sense to me and many other users. I don't understand why it was scrapped but I won't speculate on it... I'll only say that it satisfied both camps and with no obvious intrusion or loss of functionality.
You're obviously in at least as good a situation to guess as I, but I think the reason had to do with the way the touchscreen has reduced sensitivity at the edges.
The correct solution seems to be an improved calibration tool, but it's uunderstandable that the previous situation was deemed unacceptable (though I don't think this is better).
What you seem to fail to realize is that the right approach will look like a "pick one" to users depending on their personal usage. Touch the screen with your narrow stylus and the UI gives you stylus-based input modes. Touch it with your big greasy finger and you get big fat icons and gestures. Simple. Elegant. Effective. Win-win.
Agreed, but that's not what we had, so we lost it.

I wish we had 5-point calibration, with separate position & pressure.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Benson For This Useful Post: