View Single Post
Posts: 25 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Apr 2008
#157
Originally Posted by witznitz View Post
WTF am i still writing about Apple vs Nokia.

Both units are in different worlds.

It really shows how dumb this thread really is.

I look at it this way if the itouch had a better screen and bluetooth maybe I would like it more.

I hate companies that sucker people in all day. SONY, APPLE,

Look at PS3 hype with no good games... LOL most powerful? LOL
and I dont own a ps3 or xbox360.........

Microsoft did what they said.... Sony? Not.

Apple create a cool device but thats so did Samsung, LG, HTC, Sharp Zuars, Nokia,

Apple selling SDK kits for 100$ OMG so you can build open source code?
Open source means free right?

Their a joke. Also when Iphone sales did crappy they said it was ATT.

No it was not it was a 699$ unit with 4GB of space and a 2 year contract with minual data /voice plan.

Add it up 24 months
No, open source doesn't mean free I got where you're going with this, but open source just means you'll get the source. I know of a few projects that are open source but you need to buy the software/device (TiVo) to get the code.

Also, open source is now a marketing term rather than any meaningful term as most users of open source applications don't develop so they could careless. Open source doesn't provide any benefits over an open platform (which Steve Jobs has been telling their developers we'll have to see at this year's mac developer conference). As long as there's a motivated community developing on an any (open/closed) system then the applications [of the technology] are endless.