Attack? Perhaps you could show me the attack in my post; I missed it. (I won't presume to speak for the others, but some elaboration on some of theirs might be helpful as well.) The statement you quoted was explaining where the rest of my response comes from. It really doesn't make horribly much sense when you take it out of context, but I even so I don't think it constitutes an attack.

As for who was named; my name was not invoked, I concede. Which is relevant, how?
The comment was addressed to who are So the first clause would include everyone who posted in this thread; the second, as an accusation of things that didn't happen, doesn't literally apply to any of us. But plainly it was intended to apply to some of us; I think it's reasonable to construe it as intended for all the opponents of Reggie's original download section.

One who paints with a broad brush is likely to receive defenses from many directions; if pa28pilot's goal was to target only certain individuals, listing their names would have been appropriate.

Huh? Not really.
Wait a minute, none of us named you; I'll bet someone did this to you someplace else and you accidentally replied here...