View Single Post
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#59
Originally Posted by sondjata View Post
Well actually, I thought it was rude for a number of reasons.

A) The assumption that one didn't look at any other page on the thread.
B) The assumption that any person, especially new persons, may have known that the originator of the subject had long left the building.
C) The assumption that when a thread goes to be 50 million comments that one ought to be crassly told to go through potentially all of them to find a single hyperlink.

That last one is what made it "Prickable" in my book...
Agreed. However,..



...lastly, the offending poster, knew he was being a prick and said so. purposely being a prick gives other people the right to call you one too.
Ya didn't need to start a new thread for the sole purpose of calling him that, and...

A) In your new thread, not linking to the relevant post... (It took someone else to even point to the thread.)

B) When you did chime in to retort, again no link.

It seems the problem is that once the original starter of a thread fades, no one else can edit the first post.

Here's an idea!

The next time this happens why not start a new thread with an appropriate title, post links to the updated information, (like qole did) and then explain your reasons for doing so, including your "prick" diatribe.


But then again... we wouldn't get to see GeneralAntilles name next to your "Don't be a Prick" title every now and then when we hit the "New Posts" link.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: