View Single Post
Posts: 34 | Thanked: 16 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#67
Originally Posted by krisse View Post


Are YOU serious? Do you really think phones have to be "activated" before they can work with a phone network?

That's just American phone network operators conning you.

There's absolutely no reason at all why your operator has to have any involvement whatsoever in which phone you buy or use.

It would be like your ISP telling you that your PC has to be "activated", or your electricity company telling you that your toaster has to be "activated". It's just a lie pure and simple.

I'm outside America, and I can put my SIM card in any device I want, and it works straight away. My network operator doesn't know or care what I use, as long as I pay my phone bill they're happy.




Fair enough, and this is a more sensible entry price of course, the original was ludcriously high.

It's just weird how many people are comparing the $199 here with the $400 that a tablet costs on its own without a contract, because they're not really the same kind of price: one is an initial payment, the other is a total payment.
I think now we are in sync. I agree with this statement and have commented before in the dreaded iphone vs. tablet threads about them being different devices and thus not really comparable.

This thread, I thought, was going to be about how this move by apple will affect other companies' strategies. They always morph into tablet vs. iphone though... (I probably unknowingly contribute to that trend)

No worries about the tones. I feel that forums are rather impersonal and difficult to read with correct tone.

Sorry if I came off wrong as well. I'm definitely not trying to argue. Just interested in people's takes on this move by Apple.

Last edited by stjuste; 2008-06-09 at 22:41.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to stjuste For This Useful Post: