View Single Post
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#154
Originally Posted by nilchak View Post
so for this basic function I did show that a iPhone works out to be a much more cheaper and effective device. (cost-effective is the operative word here).
No, you actually didn't. Not absolutely.

You showed that the iPhone was more cost-effective in certain scenarios. I am saying that in others it is not-- depending on intended use.

If I want a miniature laptop, the iPhone is not at all cost-effective. The tablet is. Just one counter scenario. It depends.

and I am only loving the iPhone for the cost (not for style or anything else)- I am no rabid Apple fan boy, at least not as much as you are a Nokia NIT fanboy
Nice try, but the paint doesn't stick. Reread my original reply to you-- it was objective. I acknowledged both sides of the argument. I've also stated admiration for the iPhone numerous times here.

And my involvement with the tablets is directly related to my career. Supporting them isn't something as silly as "fanboyism"-- it's just what I've done for a living. Huge difference.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net

Last edited by Texrat; 2008-06-11 at 13:09.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: