Joking aside, the Pandora development process has been remarkable in its openness and the way community input has been incorporated "en route". It's exactly the opposite of how Nokia treats the Itablet user community. We know that 100 selected developers have received the "Mk 0" development edition of the Pandora; we know that there is a problem with the USB chip that needs to be addressed by the manufacturer (and sharing that information with the community scathed pretty close to a breach of NDA); we already know that the Pandora -- contrary to earlier announcements -- will have bluetooth onboard; we have seen the circuit boards; we have seen the prototype cases; we have seen a developer board boot.
How much of all this did Nokia share with its community? There is a thread on this board about the ergonomics of the D-pad, almost identical to threads that were started not long after the 770 came out; how much of the input in those threads made it to the N800?
You have to realize that Nokia isn't in the least bit interested in community input for the Itablet line; they're only interested in a community that will alleviate the work they would have to do themselves otherwise.