View Single Post
qgil's Avatar
Posts: 3,105 | Thanked: 11,088 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Mountain View (CA, USA)
#55
Originally Posted by lpotter View Post
I believe what he is alluding to is if Nokia were to stop developing and distributing Qt under the GPL. It would then, under the agreement with KDE Foundation, KDE could then revert Qt to a less restrictive license, BSD.
Which leads again to the question: What would be the business reason to do that? What would be the benefit for Nokia doing so?

To those still concerned about Qt in the hands of Nokia: big successful businesses might be evil or not, but if they are indeed succesful is because the steps they make generate benefits & profits. When thinking about evil possibilities make sure you find a potential business benefit tied to it. If you can't, then perhaps that evil possibility is unlikely to happen.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post: