This is exactly what I like from the maemo.org community.
Nokia is part of it.

I usually never take extreme positions.
I am in favor of open source, but not against commercial applications (if the commercial companies play fair).
I am in favor of commercial applications, but not against open source ones.

I see quality in both of them.
I demand from both of them what can be reasonably demanded.
I might not pretend from an open source, free application a particular feature or even a bug fix, but I might pretend it from a commercial one I paid for.
And examples go on like that.

In Maemo.org there's no real bright line. We all play together on a common platform.
I can choose to develop on it only for the fun of it.
I can choose to develop on it for fun and decide to make money out of it.
I can choose to develop on it just to make money out of it.
Nokia is providing me all the tools I need. The decision is up to me.

What differentiate it from other platforms is that all the tools that Nokia gave me, are free.
On the iPhone I would have to pay even if I choose to make my application free.
On Symbian and Windows Mobile is the same.
The tools to develop are not free (AFAIK).
That's understandable even if I do not agree with it. Those platform are targeted at a completely different kind of community.
Fair.

What I'd like to see in the logo is this collaboration.
I has to look as an open source/free logo. You look at it and you think about openness and freedom.
I hope the chosen one will make this .. clear.

Update: jussi logo, for example, reflects what I've said about collaboration. There is a line, not bright, but is there. We all collaborate. I like it.