If it needs an increased software quality, i'd rather like to get a bug report or an email about those flaws than finding it being listed in some wiki under "needs fixing". And if it actually needs fixing, i really wonder why it got listed there in the first place.

This is open source. If you or someone else thinks that going the maemo way is necessary, then this person is invited to contribute and do exactly this. This is how OSS works. If noone is interested in actually doing this then there's either no benefit of doing so or there's not enough interest in that project. That also would indicate that this project does not fall under "remarkable projects".

I'd really appreciate a "list of cool software". But e.g. limiting it to projects following certain maemo rules by 100% will very likely make it only contain projects i already know.