Thread
:
Diablo...worth updating?
View Single Post
Benson
2008-07-09 , 15:30
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#
12
I seriously doubt that upgrading to Diablo via unsupported and hackful SSU from Chinook will have any difference in battery life.
For my (anecdotal) evidence:
I used:
Chinook on internal flash: Good battery life.
another Chinook on the SD: Good battery life.
pseuDiablo on the SD: Good battery life.
(There was not, among these 3, any discernable difference in ordinary usage; I didn't do any actual tests with reproducible load, though.)
Debian on the SD: I never used it long enough without rebooting to draw any conclusions.
Now I've got:
Diablo (released) on internal flash: Good battery life.
Chinook on the SD (clone of the previous Chinook/internal): Good battery life.
I don't see any substantial difference, and there's no reason there should be. However, almost all of these installations occasionally had severe battery drain, when I accidentally left some process stomping at 100% CPU; metalayer-crawler (until I disabled it on each installation, of course) and the browser were the most frequent offenders.
__________________
World's first inductively-charged N900!
Quote & Reply
|
Benson
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Benson
Find all posts by Benson