View Single Post
Posts: 1,097 | Thanked: 650 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#42
Did I ever negate your point about it being a bad package ? Read the lines instead of reading your own distorted viewpont... trust me it will feel refreshing to actually understand what someone says.

I only said for me the package worked, I never said that constitutes a 'good' package. In fact I accept that it may be a bad package but that does not mean the software features under discussion (one app for multi protocol talk) is also painted bad because of bad packaging.

You know sometimes when the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem seems like a nail you got to bang on the head with. :-)

Last edited by nilchak; 2008-07-22 at 14:45.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nilchak For This Useful Post: