Thread
:
What woud you realistically like to see in the N900?
View Single Post
allnameswereout
2008-08-01 , 16:36
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#
913
What is more important: more RAM or faster CPU?
IMO CPU, because starting & using MicroB (even w/o extensions) is simply too slow for fast usage. The NIT should IMO be a device you pull out of your pocket to look up something quickly. Some functionality is quick like RSSm weatherm or e-mail but there are some options you really need a browser for. For example: to look up when a train arrives, or a price check on a product while you're shopping.
It is also important to note that the competition is in usability and the hardware / price for money field. Tablets will become more popular, and there are already competitors & clones coming out too. Nokia will have to decide its position on the market, and the N900 is an ideal milestone to do so.
PS: I am interested in making an
objective
Wiki page about this subject with all the pros and cons outlined. The idea is to devide in 3 parts: 1) small changes (e.g. a bug or feature previously in a NIT) 2) big changes (ie. things Nokia would use in a marketing announcement) 3) research / expensive changes (like e.g. solar power, totally different hardware platform, and so on). What more should I keep in mind before I start?
__________________
Goosfraba!
All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
Last edited by allnameswereout; 2008-08-01 at
16:45
. Reason: PS
Quote & Reply
|
allnameswereout
View Public Profile
Send a private message to allnameswereout
Find all posts by allnameswereout