View Single Post
Posts: 132 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on May 2007 @ Portugal
#10
Originally Posted by Capt'n Corrupt View Post
I think that Nokia is betting on Wimax. As a device manufacturer, they're concerned with selling hardware, not monthly subscriptions.

I doubt that the large North American telcos are eager to support this technology. As I understand it, Wimax is more 'open' than other types of networks; there can be more players involved. If this is the case then it opens the door for competition, which mean prices, and eventually revenues drop.
...
Corrupt.11g
WiMax can also be seen as a wireless extension of fixed broadband. In USA, AT&T is looking at WiMax to provide broadband access to remote areas, and in countries like India the operators are doing the same. In Developing countries there is a significant number of wiMax Deployments and it is also staring in East Europe, France, etc.).

What I find interesting in WiMax is the possibility that this technology may force Mobile operators to move from the cashcow model to a flat rate model, unlimited access that exists in most countries for fixed broadband. In the end, WiMax may lead to a radical change in Mobile market. Sprint has already indicated that they are planning to do something in these lines.

A interesting market to watch is Korea where a Wimax (Wibro) like network is changing the rules of the game.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to luso For This Useful Post: