View Single Post
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#1061
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
Do not want.

It's better as an add-on. I pointed out that it'd be really neat to have a geek port/slot.. in another thread I'd mentioned maybe a PCIe connector for micro devices in an expansion port? That would probably be the best thing. My old Handsprings and my Palm Tungsten T5 had a built-in IR... I never used it for anything except on the extremely rare occasion of printing to my IR enabled printer. IR ports are very slow for data and to make the signal bright enough for using as a remote controller, you'd use a lot of battery life--this is why you needed an add-on on the Palm computers to do that. I could see myself using an IR port--but I could want to use something else more.
Yup. There's a reason mobile devices that do have IR ports still tend to not be usable as IR remote controls. It's not that you can put the signal into them, it's that the power available to the emitter isn't enough to be useful for that. And, really, that's how it should be. I expect that the impact on the design of the NIT, or any other mobile, to add this would be pretty prohibitive.

I think it makes more sense to ask someone to build a wifi-to-IR gateway device, where you could send signals to the gateway via wifi, and then that device would have a remote-control-quality IR emitter for sending signals to your devices. You could then position that somewhere in your livingroom that was useful.

What might be nice, though, is a typical data exchanging IR emitter/receiver on the NIT. The kind you get on an E61/E61i/E62/E71, so that you could do data synchronization through it with other Nokia devices (not just other NITs). But I doubt we'll see that. And don't say "that's what bluetooth is for". Bluetooth has some issues that make it not a total replacement for IR data syncing.
__________________
My Personal Blog