View Single Post
Posts: 11 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Sep 2008
#55
Originally Posted by allnameswereout View Post
True, although its possible such proof can be falsified. I'm not a proponent of internet voting. As far as I'm concerned it has serious issues (including this one) and therefore it shouldn't be used for anything serious.
The ability to sell one's vote is a minor problem compared to things like fraud and low turnout. More obviously, it's far easier to buy a politician who represents 50,000 voters than to buy thousands of votes to buy your favorite politician into office. (And a permanent absentee voter like myself, can always sell his vote anyway - and this isn't causing and horrendous problems that I'm aware of here in California.)

Say you implement something like Rivest's ThreeBallot system, or Chaum's Punchscan system. You have virtually fraud-free elections, and high turnout. A few people who may sell their votes is hardly your major concern.