[1] Nokia is still learning from the open source model. Examples are then mentioned.
[2] Nokia asserts the open source community has to learn from proprietary model. In a proprietary model (or business model) you cannot just ship ffmpeg or mp3 decoder becaue you believe its useful to the user, or because its open source. You need a code review e.g. to search for copyright infringement, patent infringement, or EULA infringement (think w32codec here). I'm a Fluendo customer for this very reason. Then, examples are made. What he essentially says, between the lines, is that neither Nokia or the open source community can change overnight, but we have to adapt and learn to each other. Sometimes that means making sacrifices instead of idealism. This is called being pragmatic, practical, something a negotiator knows very well. An example for this is a SIM lock. This part cannot be open source because this lock is necessary in the current ecosystem. The way phones are sold demands this. I don't like this either, and the protection is laughable, but it exists. Nokia cannot afford to change this (overnight). If you don't like this behaviour I'd say that right now Nokia is not the right corporation to do business with.