Fine, provide all the substantive comments and context you want. But my conversation on UI is not O/T and is inappropriate because it's based on conjecture. A lot of the posts here are conjecture or speculation. Your opinion as to what should be discussed is not more important than anybody else's and this is the third post in a row you have purported to say what should be discussed in this thread. As to interrupting... you told me to take my conversation somewhere else - to wit:

"For us to stay on topic in this thread, those answers would be needed. Nothing about UI/UX was detailed in any notes that came from the summit.
Now, if we wanna start talking about what UI concepts could be present in Maemo 5 (in effect building the bridge before we get to the stream); then either on the Tablet UI Blog, or here in another thread, we can start that discussion."

Interrupting was a bit of a polite euphemism when you TWICE IN A ROW said that, in your opinion, the UI wasn't worth talking about and told me to go somewhere else to talk about it even after I politely asked your indulgence in letting me talk about UI.