View Single Post
Posts: 662 | Thanked: 238 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#17
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
I felt the same way at the time, but grew to reconsider.

Clinton put himself in a compromising position, and thus the country at risk, and IMO he deserved impeachment... even if the rationale was something as simple as lying under oath.

And to get back on topic, Palin isn't in the same league as any other politician mentioned here so far IMO.
I thought Clinton was a rather good president. Maybe not so good a man, but a good leader, nonetheless...

And Yes!

I *don't* want a politician as VP! "Politician" was never meant to be a profession! The founding fathers expected it to be held by someone who represented the community, fixed problems, then left and went back to running his farm or buisness. It was never supposed to be a permanent job.

Palin never intended to make a living off of politics (from the news and her), but apparently she did pretty damn well up north, and she fixed problems