View Single Post
Posts: 38 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#42
Originally Posted by SD69 View Post
That's the ironic part. open source software is supposed to be cheaper than other software, but the NITs are not cheaper. While Maemo is based on open source, and is relatively open, its advantage to the user is not price. The advantage to the user is that it's a better OS for handheld touchscreen devices. Most of the advantages are on the SW developer side. So far, Nokia hasn't sought to license Maemo.
How strange. I don't know too much about the financial side of software/licensing etc.. But I would assume that if you had 2 identical pieces of hardware, but one had Symbian running on it and one had Maemo, the latter would be cheaper...? Of course Nokia now owns Symbian completely so once again, would this not affect the total price of a handset?
Originally Posted by lm2 View Post
If it had been two words, you could have accused them of jumping to conclusions. For I had always thought it was short for "avoid flamings, not constructive feedback."
Ha, I can definately say I've not heard that one before!