View Single Post
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#38
Originally Posted by lma View Post
For me these are nice-to-haves but not deciding factors. Also not a factor: the "HD" camera. Let's face it, it's not even going to come close in quality (lens, sensor, image processing) to the Lumix I'm already carrying everywhere.
Most people who will buy a N900 will not carry around a Lumix everywhere. For most normal purposes the HD camera is good enough. If you buy a new smartphone its not as if you require all features either. You look at the complete pack, and decide.

If you take the 2-3 times better performance into account: very welcome. You mention more RAM is what you want, but better processor performance also allows more swapping. Better battery life allows better performance; and better performance allows better battery life. So if you look at it from such angle, the better performance is very welcome, and you will very much appreciate it. Think of it. Would you prefer MicroB to start up faster? Would you want to surf faster? Its a no-brainer. Nokia cannot screw this part up except software-wise. And we'll know more about performance once Pandora is out (ZzZz).
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!

Last edited by allnameswereout; 2008-12-08 at 14:55.