View Single Post
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#102
Originally Posted by ragnar View Post
When the alternative seems to put your head firmly in the sand like an ostrich and to deny all problems relating to energy use, global warming etc., I for one am happy that a company like Nokia tries to do something about something. When a huge company does even small changes and small improvements, it has big effects.
Except when, you know, it doesn't. Turning off the lights is not analogous here.

Let's try to avoid the preachy warm-fuzzies and stick to the facts (now that we have them).

Originally Posted by ragnar View Post
There is virtually no extra energy consumed, since the tablet is on anyway when it is charging.
These aren't desktop machines that consume huge amounts of power when they're on and idle, these are mobile computers that consume practically nothing when they're idle. A tablet can run for 30 days when it's completely idle.

Any argument claiming that a tablet consumes the same amount of power when it's on with the screen off and the CPU idle, as when it's on with the screen on and the CPU active displaying a banner is completely and entirely bogus. The first situation can get up to 30 days of battery life, the second might get you 7 hours.

So, yes, turning the screen and CPU on to display a banner uses a non-trivial amount of energy. Honestly, I find it somewhat disturbing that a UI designer doesn't seem to realize exactly how little power the tablets use at idle (or maybe you're just overlooking it to boost your argument). :\
__________________
Ryan Abel

Last edited by GeneralAntilles; 2008-12-17 at 20:54. Reason: My muscle memory, for some goddamn reason, wants to make words longer at the expense of accuracy and keystrokes. . . .
 

The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: